There’s
a new brand of Christianity afoot in the music industry—let’s
call it “stealth Christianity.” And whether you choose
to be wary of it or not, you should know that there’s
no parental-advisory sticker for the ideology that some
young alternative groups may be subtly (and sometimes
not-so-subtly) spreading around as they take over the
Billboard charts.
Recently,
some Christian acts who have had success in the “sacred”
market have been repackaged ambiguously enough to succeed
in the secular market as well. It’s a recent trend that
many record execs are calling the “Switchfoot model,”
based on the successful alternative rock band of the same
name.
The
members of Switchfoot are careful not to preach the gospel
or even discuss their Christianity in the press. (In fact,
they have a history of declining interviews they believe
would try to involve them in a discussion of religion
in rock.) Nevertheless, in 2004, Switchfoot were the No.
1 contemporary Christian band, according to Billboard.
Simultaneously, in the secular market, the group took
the No. 33 spot on the Billboard Hot 100 for 2004—and
I’d venture to guess that a good portion of the secular
record-buying public have no idea that they are buying
an album by an avowedly “born-again” Christian rock band.
This
is a new kind of evangelical mission, wherein groups subtly
become a part of the norm rather than trying to convert
people with fire and brimstone. And with so many young
people finding their role models among alt-rockers, the
acts may have the power to transform popular culture from
within.
Crossover
bands certainly avoid preaching (that would be a death
knell to mainstream success), but they may be subtly conveying
values and messages to young people that are clearly conservative
and Christian—all but for the omission of the word “Jesus.”
Lyrically, the bands tend to skirt direct references in
order to court the mainstream, but consistently hammer
home what they often term “positive” messages to listeners.
Back
in 2000, Switchfoot gloried in such uncloaked gospel as
“Maybe redemption has stories to tell/Maybe forgiveness
is right where you fell. . . /Where you gonna go? Salvation
is here” (from “I Dare You to Move”), while most of their
“love” lyrics were directed at the “you” with a capital
“Y.”
The
group’s very successful crossover album, The Beautiful
Letdown, found them pulling back a little bit and
throwing in “edgier” stuff, yet the ideology was still
in the lines not between them, as in the
holy warrior stance of the title track (which perhaps
outlines Switchfoot’s mission against the mainstream):
“I’m gonna set sight and set sail for the kingdom come/I
will carry a cross and a song where I don’t belong.”
The
distinction here, as the record-exec spin masters tell
it, is between Christian bands and bands who happen to
be Christians. And Christianity hasn’t always been as
antithetical to rock as one might think—U2 and Bruce Cockburn
are just two examples of artists that have flown their
Christian flags at times (though from much more progressive
standpoints than the new crop of artists). The difference
today is that the line between secular and Christian may
be becoming completely blurred in alternative and modern
rock.
You
might even consider it part of a larger neoconservative
drift in the United States, wherein fundamentalist Christianity
is influencing mass media and pop culture more and more.
For example, the FCC, beginning with President Bush’s
first-term appointment of Michael Powell as chair in 2001,
has undertaken a well-publicized, nearly Puritan crusade
against the airwaves in recent years.
Until
his Sirius move, Howard Stern consistently lamented that
he had more freedom in radio 20 years ago; Chuck Lorre,
producer of TV sitcom Two and a Half Men, pointed
out in a televised letter to viewers that he works in
an industry that is “more comfortable showing a dead naked
body than a live one” after he was forced to remove a
scene showing a woman’s naked back from the show; while
the Janet Jackson incident provided an excuse to further
crack down on already vigilantly monitored frequencies.
The
FCC’s other historic mandate is to keep a cap on corporate
growth in media. Unwieldy, conservative-friendly oligopolies
like Viacom, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. and Clear Channel
are evidence that they have all but abandoned this initiative.
(Viacom head Sumner Redstone, a lifelong Democrat, urgently
and openly supports the Bush administration because conservatives
let him buy as many companies as he needs to.)
All
of which is to say that our media culture is primed for
the wholesome goodness of acts like Switchfoot, MxPx,
and P.O.D.—as long as their message is couched in the
marketable trappings of loud alternative rock and edgy
hipness, with all the stigmatic religious traces obscured
just enough to appeal to secular kids.
And
with neoconservative-friendly media giants such as Viacom
(who owns MTV) and Clear Channel (which controls most
radio playlists in our country) controlling taste, these
groups may have even more of a leg up on the industry.
But
when did Christian rock groups start not-so- quietly blending
into the mainstream, and how do Christian acts make the
jump from the sacred to secular market?
While
there were Christian groups every bit as good as their
secular counterparts in the past—’80s Christian alternative
rockers the Choir and the 77’s were good bands based on
any standard—they never made a true jump to the mainstream
in terms of tastes or sales.
Rather,
a good starting point is Creed’s success in the mid-’90s.
While critically reviled, they were successful enough
and ambiguous enough about their strict Christianity to
provide an early model for current groups like Switchfoot.
The
current crop of stealth Christian rockers learned from
Creed’s example, however: Switchfoot don’t promote themselves
as Christian, lest they fall into an unappealing pigeonhole.
Nevertheless, they play numerous Christian rock festivals
throughout the year and enjoy a core fanbase amongst the
devout.
But
in order to take over the mainstream, the bands have to
have mainstream record companies backing them. And in
this era of debt-heavy conglomerates, record companies
want low-risk investments—i.e., bands with an already
large and proven fanbase of buyers. Record execs remained
largely ignorant of the financial possibilities in Christian
rock until the mid-’90s, when SoundScan, the then-new
electronic sales-tracking system, began monitoring (the
previously ignored) Christian genre and revealed some
of the acts as top sellers.
They
suddenly became a presence on Billboard, so major labels
starting looking at alt- and modern-rock Christian acts
that were 1) selling lots of albums, and 2) capably echoing
the trends, sounds and styles of successful mainstream
acts.
The
secret was toning down the religious messages enough to
gain mainstream fans, while keeping intact and not offending
the large core Christian fanbase. (At times, there’s an
almost Karl Rove-ian inscrutability to the business surrounding
Christian acts.)
Rap-rockers
and fiercely born-again Christians P.O.D. provided an
important benchmark around the millennium. In a February
2005 New York Times article, “Missionaries to the
Mainstream”, Lee Trink, former product manager for Atlantic
Records, remembered overseeing the band’s promotion. He
described his primary goal as “declassifying” the band
as Christian while trying to preserve the group’s devoutly
observant fanbase. For his efforts, Trink saw P.O.D. sell
60 million records and earn a Grammy nomination (in 2001,
for best hard rock album).
But
let’s consider some of P.O.D.’s more fiery (and frighteningly
nationalist) rhetoric, from their tune, “Breathe Babylon”
(1999): “Overthrown you like Sodom and Gomorrah, arm of
the law/Guilty of all crimes I be like the great Prophet
Isaiah/Predict your fall over 150 times/Got rhymes you
could never use for the purpose you be using, I’ll dance
over your fields/Present day Iraq still lies in ruins
lies, Schemes, backstab persuasions bum rushed/Get crushed
by us, this rescue invasion.”
After
P.O.D.’s success, A&R executives began even more urgently
looking to Christian rock as a source of youth-oriented
rock acts. (Independent Seattle label Tooth & Nail—a
company that hedges at labeling itself Christian and simply
claims to “creatively express positivity through music”—has
served as a proving ground for numerous Christian acts
in the mainstream rock world.)
So,
Tipper Gore be damned, here’s another reason to closely
monitor what your kids are listening to: They may be adopting
role models who are sometimes not-so-covertly preaching
a fundamentalist gospel. Young people are the predominant
record-buying public, and we may be exposing a whole generation
to faith-based rhetoric disguised as alternative rock.