bach’s
still in the house
by erik hage
wmht hangs on to the classical-music format against all
odds
If
recent events and trends are any indication, classical
music might have a dim future on public radio. This is
a story with few, if any, bright spots. It not only highlights
the jeopardy of classical radio, but the tenuous federal
funding of all public broadcasting. (In commercial radio,
classical programming is down to about 20 stations, vs.
41 public, having been decimated by the debt-heavy economics
of corporate consolidation.)
There’s a ray of hope locally, however, as the Capital
Region’s classical music station WMHT-FM 89.1 (also heard
on WRHV-FM 88.7, Poughkeepsie) is a relative success story
in a format facing daunting challenges.
But first, the bad news: On June 1, Connecticut Public
Radio (WNPR) axed almost all of its classical-music programs
in favor of talk radio and news. In comments to the Hartford
Courant, the upper-level administration at WNPR cited
a decline of classical-music listeners and, more urgently,
a plummet in support during membership campaigns, which
are the lifeline of public radio. (WMHT, for example,
relies on the community for three-quarters of the money
it spends.)
In short, classical music was hurting the bottom line,
and Connecticut simply echoed a nationwide trend: Just
last year, WETA-FM in Washington, D.C.—once a major station
in the classical format—changed over from music to talk
and news. (Another factor in the mix: post-9/11 interest
in talk radio spiked.)
Bill Winans, the operations manager of WMHT, is all too
aware of the reverberations from across the border. “It’s
closer to home than any of the other [format changes]
we’ve been announcing the last few years,” he points out.
“Detroit, of course, was a big one a few years ago . .
. and Washington D.C. This one is getting closer.”
There’s a bigger picture here as well, one that impacts
all public programming. On June 7, the House Appropriations
Subcommittee proposed cutting $115 million dollars from
public broadcasting. Next week, the full House will review
this proposal, and within four months the cuts could be
enacted.
Last year, the Subcommittee recommended zero funding for
public broadcasting (a $223 million cut), but listeners
lit up legislators’ phone lines, and a bipartisan majority
in the House was able to restore funding.
This federal money supports more than 1,000 public-radio
and TV stations in the United States—not just music programming,
but journalistic, educational and local outreach efforts
as well. (The Corporation for Public Broadcasting—CPB—is
a private corporation created by Congress that both distributes
the appropriation and serves as a buffer between partisan
politics and public broadcasting.)
So amid all of these dismal trends, where does WMHT, a
public-radio station fully dedicated to classical programming,
stand? Chris Wienk, vice president of radio at the station,
points to Audience 2010 (released by the Radio Research
Consortium in May) for some perspective. The extensive
and important report designates U.S. public stations as
“climbers,” “divers” or “cruisers” based on audience momentum
in recent years.
“WMHT
is the only all-classical station to hit the ‘climber’
list,” Wienk says. “We had an audience low point four
or five years ago, where the station was down to about
45,000 listeners, from a peak of 80,000—and we are now
back up to the peak, so we’ve come out of the bottom of
the pit.” (Local station WAMC, which serves a less specialized
audience, is designated a “diver.”)
This is all the more remarkable, as WMHT, now in its 34th
year, has to endure the challenges facing both public
radio and the classical format. Wienk notes that part
of WMHT’s success comes from sticking to tried-and-true
classical radio dynamics.
“We
are pretty traditional in our sound. . . . We play full-length
works, and we pause a second or so before and after each
piece.” He adds that many classical stations try to break
out of the grey ghetto by adhering to a more modern approach
and playing more recognized compositions.
Wienk is perhaps too modest to point out that the listener
turnaround came during his tenure, which began four years
ago. According to Winans, “Chris has taken over choosing
the music in the last several years [and] our audience
has increased exponentially since then. Chris has very
tightly formatted the station.”
There’s also a less romantic reality to the economics
of WMHT: Having laid off the bulk of its on-air staff
in 2003, the station relies heavily on a national satellite
feed. WMHT’s Web site shows several photographs and bios
of the “on-air talent,” but the only local staff pictured
are Wienk and Bill Winans. (Many of the other DJs have
roots in the rich landscape of Minnesota Public Radio.)
Nevertheless, the local skeleton crew produces several
key programs, including the popular Baroque show Bach’s
Lunch.
Another obvious key element is the support of the listening
community, and currently the station is in the midst of
one of its life-affirming pledge drives. Wienk, a transplant
from commercial radio, says he actually got into public
radio because of pledge drives.
“I
thought, ‘This is where public radio has all its personality.
It’s so exciting for me to listen to a pledge drive. That’s
why I love listening to Alan Chartock [president and CEO
of WAMC] when he’s on a pledge drive. It’s so much more
personable to me.
. . . People may like or dislike what he’s doing, but
I think he does an amazing job of resonating with the
emotion of the radio station for you in your life. That’s
what we try to do.”
As for the future of classical music in general, a May
28 New York Times article (“This is the Golden Age”) disputes
the death of the genre, suggesting that classical music
is in fact undergoing a rejuvenation and is more relevant
than ever. Winans agrees: “Classical music’s time has
come again.”
He also believes that the radio format will survive, despite
the devastating economics of public radio and the bottom-line
urgency of consolidated commercial radio. “Most radio
stations, by the force of sheer economics, have been forced
to program strictly by the numbers. And what you end up
with is one radio clone after another. But people aren’t
stupid. I think they’re eventually going to go and look
for something unique.”
Wienk remains cautious, however, and is wary of the New
York Times article’s assertions. “The guy [Allan Kozinn]
didn’t substantiate any of his claims. It really scares
me, because I don’t want people to think that the fight
is over, [to think that] classical music is safe. I don’t
think it is. I mean, I don’t think it’s going to go anywhere,
and I do believe there are young people who are going
to want to listen to classical music.” He cites the example
of an 18-year-old intern at the station who is a lifelong
listener of WMHT and classical music fan.
But he also indicates that most people who listen to classical
music get it from the radio, “so it’s got to stay on radio
somehow because otherwise no one’s going to be exposed
to it.” Wienk also runs down a list of “hitmakers”—that
is, artists who are an album-selling market force. He
lists people such as youthful sibling group the Five Browns,
the ubiquitous Yo Yo Ma, and
violinist-composer Joshua Bell, who, exclaims Wienk with
emphatic seriousness, is “somewhat of a sex symbol!”
WMHT’s success at staying financially afloat in the troubled
economics of radio has also led to the acquisition of
WBKK-FM (97.7), a smaller classical station that operates
out of the same studio. Having bought it out of bankruptcy
last summer and converted it into a public station, Wienk
is aiming at “a younger listener” with the new endeavor.
With Classical 97.7, he hopes to be more contemporary
and less daunting.
“There
are a lot of people who listen to classical music who
consider themselves casual listeners. They kind of just
like to hear the familiar sounds. So we thought, let’s
try to reach those people with what they want to hear.”
WBKK hits about 300,000 listeners (versus the million
or so of WMHT) and is run without any additional staff,
with the small WMHT crew, including Wienk, pitching in
on production and on-air time for little compensation.
“It’s an expensive endeavor to run a radio station. You
have to do it carefully, so we’re running WBKK on a shoestring,”
claims Wienk, who can often be heard on the air at WBKK.
“We’re a lean, mean fighting machine, I guess you’d say.”