 |
| Hello,
new venue: installation view of Wrestle. |
Disconnect
and Reconnect
By
Nadine Wasserman
Graduate Thesis Exhibitions
Center
for Curatorial Studies, Bard College, through March 25
Wrestle
Hessel
Museum of Art, Bard College, through May 27
Contemporary
art often is challenging. However, the more you see of it,
the less confounding it becomes. Fortunately, for people in
the Capital Region, within an hour’s drive are some incredible
institutions for experiencing interesting and cutting-edge
work. Bard’s Center for Curatorial Studies (CCS) is among
the best. It is particularly worthwhile to go right now when
you can catch both Wrestle, the inaugural exhibition
in the recently added Hessel Museum of Art, and the master’s
thesis exhibitions by newly emerging curators. The current
thesis exhibitions are Now You See It, curated by Ryan
Doherty; Temporarily Disconnected, curated by Ruba
Katrib; We Love Cinema, curated by Özkan Cangüven;
and Affinities: Painting in Abstraction, curated by
Kate Meehan McNamara. This set (which will end on March 25)
will be followed by two more sets of exhibitions over the
next several weeks.
Nurtured by the A-list faculty for the CCS program, the thesis
exhibitions are generally well-conceived and sophisticated.
Unfortunately, this round of exhibitions was not as interesting
as some have been in the past. There was far too much emphasis
on film and video, and one would have to spend more than three
and a half hours just to view all of it. There is no doubt
that film and video are important mediums in contemporary
art, but in two of the shows there was little effort to contain
the audio, and the effect was overstimulating. It was often
difficult to focus on any one piece. Since the soundtracks
were bleeding into one another, it was often impossible to
hear some of the work, even when standing or sitting right
in front of a monitor. Temporarily Disconnected and
We Love Cinema were both ambitious in theme but suffered
from being completely video-based and poorly designed. The
works included were all interesting, but were not easily experienced
given the aural and visual assault.
After the noise of the previous exhibitions it was actually
a relief to enter into the painting exhibition where there
was space to contemplate static objects. Affinities: Painting
in Abstraction was a modest show that contained work by
several compelling contemporary painters, two of whom are
faculty of the Milton Avery Graduate School of the Arts at
Bard. Of note were Suzanne McClelland’s Soft Partition,
a large wall piece made of velvet, linen, satin, ribbon and
acrylic paint, and three of her smaller works on canvas and
linen. McClelland explores the play between words and the
visual, and she uses unconventional materials and techniques.
Laurel Sparks also uses unconventional materials, such as
glitter and marble dust, to create complex compositions that
are both witty and grotesque. Rebecca Morris’ paintings in
oil and spray paint take the language of abstraction and give
it a physicality that is at once reductive and elaborate.
In her work, she pays tribute to abstraction while simultaneously
critiquing it. The fact that this exhibition was made up of
work by eight women painters was never mentioned in the curator’s
statement. While we may be in a post-post-postfeminist moment,
this fact does deserve at least a brief mention. It would
certainly not detract from the power of the work on display
and it would show that the curator is aware of the context
within which these women work. It would also show that the
curator is aware that there is a current trend toward feminist
exhibitions such as Los Angeles’ MoCA’s WACK! Art and the
Feminist Revolution that acknowledge the contributions
of a generation of women artists who made it possible for
female artists to begin to move into the mainstream of the
visual arts.
Now
You See It was the most successful at displaying video
work so that each piece could be experienced without too much
interference. For Zoe Beloff’s The Ideoplastic Materializations
of Eva. C., the viewer dons 3-D glasses and enters a separate
darkened room to experience a surround-sound installation
depicting reenactments of 10 séances conducted by a French
medium between 1904 and 1913. Jennifer Bornstein’s humorous
and lyrical 16mm films run through an old-fashioned projector
and explore extraordinary phenomena such as 14-leaf clovers,
UFOs, and plant communications. Susan Hiller’s Magic Lantern
uses three slide projectors and an audio track to explore
what may lie beneath and between our perceptions of reality.
Hiller was inspired by the experimental recordings of a Latvian
scientist named Konstantin Randive, who believed he could
capture the voices of the dead on tape. In this piece, slides
of overlapping colored circles create a retinal after-image
that parallels the effect of the sound recording. Given photography’s
role since the turn of the last century in providing “proof”
of the supernatural, this exhibition cleverly uses works by
artists who employ outmoded photographic technologies to explore
both perception and our fascination with the paranormal.
Across the entryway from the master’s thesis exhibitions is
the new 17,000-square-foot Hessel Museum of Art. Wrestle,
the inaugural exhibition, draws from the more than 1,700 pieces
in the Marieluise Hessel collection and includes a selection
of more than 150 works that present what the curators call
“suggestive juxtapositions.” To visitors who have never been
to CCS, the caliber of the collection will be readily apparent
when you walk through the door to the Hessel Museum and step
onto the Do-Ho Suh work imbedded in the floor. Don’t forget
to pick up a gallery guide at the front desk if you are a
novice in contemporary art. It is extremely helpful, as are
the guards at the entrance and throughout the galleries. And
don’t forget to take a lollipop from the Felix Gonzalez-Torres
piece. You’ll have to wait to eat it until you exit the galleries,
but be advised that the white ones taste the best.
| PERIPHERAL
VISION |
|
-no
peripheral vision this week-
|
|
|