 |
|
Busy
doin’ nothin’: (l-r) Grint, Watson and Radcliffe in
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
|
The
Magic Is Lost
By
Laura Leon
Harry
Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Directed
by David Yates
My son has informed me that the seventh, and last, installment
of the Harry Potter series will be split into two separate
movies, because there is just so much information to be revealed.
Watching the sixth in the series, Harry Potter and the
Half-Blood Prince, I couldn’t help but wonder why the
filmmakers didn’t stick some of the stuff for No. 7 into this
one, as, despite its two-and-a-half-hour running time, there
isn’t a lot of plot. Indeed, the last 45 minutes seem oddly
rushed, as if director David Yates and screenwriter Steve
Kloves remembered that they had to lay the groundwork for
the long-anticipated finale.
The Half-Blood Prince is sort of like three movies
crammed into one messy and disjointed whole. It’s like a well-intentioned
pie gone bad: The crust is perfection, but the jammy goodness
inside a little too saccharine. There’s Harry’s undercover
work, at the behest of Prof. Dumbledore (Michael Gambon),
to discover what it was that new potions master Slughorn (Jim
Broadbent) told young Tom Riddle so many years ago, before
said student became “he who shall not be named.” Then there’s
the whole burgeoning hormonal thing, erupting in such ways
as to make Hogwarts look like a rather genteel Woodstock,
and causing great anguish to both Harry (Daniel Radcliffe)
and the increasingly lovely Hermione (Emma Watson), while
opening up whole new levels of entertaining fun to the doltish
Ron (Rupert Grint). In a word, eww. The final part concerns
the tormented Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton), who has pledged allegiance
to Voldemort but spends the entire movie alternating between
what looks like ads for a Hugo Boss junior exec line and remakes
of Spandeau Ballet videos. Indeed, despite the deliciously
nasty presence of adolescent Tom Riddle (Frank Dillane), and
a wickedly anarchic Helena Bonham Carter, there’s a marked
absence of menace. Even the usually reliable Alan Rickman,
as Severus Snape, gets only a few chances to intone, in his
deliciously deadpan way, lines like “It must be so nice, Potter,
to be the chosen one . . .”
Harry
Potter and the Half-Blood Prince allows viewers to measure
how the actors and the franchise have fared all these years
later; it’s not a movie to sink one’s heart and soul into.
Yates’ direction is workmanlike; he’s not as pedestrian as
Christopher Columbus (who directed the first two films), but
nowhere as fantastical as Alfonso Cuarón, whose Prisoner
of Azkaban snatched the series from a Disney-like worldview
and plunked it straight into the messy, murky environs of
death, obsession and loss.
The Potter series represents a chance to see great Brit thespians
at work, but, as with Rickman, most aren’t utilized nearly
enough. On the plus side, Broadbent is a magnificent addition,
even if his character is more of a plot device than an integrated
presence in Harry’s world. Both Radcliffe and Watson have
grown immensely in terms of their delivery, but given the
fact that they began as very green youngsters, that might
not be saying much. However, both demonstrate good comic timing
and a bit of nuance, which goes a long way in underlining
the great friendship, and the budding maturity, of their characters,
and which also comes in handy during the large early chunk
of the movie devoted primarily to the pursuit of all things
hormonal. There’s a gravity to their performances which anchors
their characters. With them, and with Gambon channeling his
inner Charlton Heston, one gets the sense that the threat
posed by Voldemort is very real, and they’re playing for keeps.
Songs
of Freedom
Afghan
Star
Directed
by Havana Marking
The documentary Afghan Star is in equal measures affirming
and alarming. As it follows a group of contestants on an Afghani
television program similar to American Idol, it offers
poignant reminders of some of the fundamental commonalities
of human experience: the instinct toward expression and joy,
the desire for appreciation and approval, the deep attachment
to home (however defined and however troubled). It also, however,
reveals the obverse side of those same qualities and activities:
the violent backlash at expression deemed subversive, the
foolishness of those desperate for attention, the hateful
zealotry of exclusive identity groups.
Though the documentary starts early in the auditioning process,
when literally thousands of contestants are vying for spots,
it focuses ultimately on three: Rafi, a 19-year-old pretty
boy; Hammeed, a classically trained singer and member of one
of Afghanistan’s most persecuted ethnic minorities; and Setara,
a 21-year-old woman with a daring, and dangerous, disregard
for the conservatism of much of the Afghani population—not
to mention the Taliban.
As much as Afghan Star is the story of these three
contestants, it is also the story of the country’s remarkably
tumultuous history over the last 30 years. Interviewees recall,
and footage illustrates, an Afghanistan likely unfamiliar
to most Westerners: a liberal and highly cultured country.
(Assuming, that is, that you believe synth-adorned new-wave
music and exposed ankles evidence of culture.)
It is sobering to see such images juxtaposed with the footage
of shelled and bullet-scarred buildings. It is unsettling
to think how such a once-free society can evolve—via religious
extremism—into one in which an adult would say with stone-faced
conviction that a loose woman should be put to death. It is
absolutely terrifying to think that in our lifetimes, not
so far away, the loose woman in question was deemed such for
dancing and exposing her hair.
As a film, Afghan Star is a little rough around the
edges. This is to be expected in a documentary made in, no
doubt, less than perfect circumstances. Even so, the pacing
of the early portion is clumsy and the reliance on screen
text to move the story forward feels strained. It’s a minor
quibble, though, and the movie quickly picks up as the competition
becomes more intense and the field of contestants narrower.
Though pop-culture cynics might find something overblown in
the rhetoric of Afghanis equating a vote for a favorite singer
with “real” democracy, or something sadly naive about the
belief that this entertainment is evidence of a trans-ethnic
brotherhood emerging in Afghanistan, it is hard not to be
affected by their hope.
Afghan
Star is a touching, dire reminder of the fragility of
freedoms we often take for granted.
—John
Rodat
|