|
Accessibility’s
Rainbow
By
Josh Potter
Inherent
Vice
By
Thomas Pynchon
Penguin, 369 pages, $27.95
By the time an author has produced a body of work singular
enough in style to garner the “-esque” suffix with which other
writers’ work can be qualified, the average reader has learned
to either avoid all such work or ravenously ingest everything
that bears its mark. Even more so when the name “Pynchon”
precedes the “esque.” Having spent more than four decades
crafting the most complex, fractal, and downright impenetrable
postmodern fiction ever written, Pynchon makes the idea of
a book review pale in comparison to the exhaustively annotated
Wiki pages that serve as operating instructions for his monstrous
tomes. Rightly so, as the act of reading Pynchon is akin to
desperately tugging on loose textual fibers in hopes that
you’ll finally find the one that holds the whole unwieldy
charade together, and any writing about Pynchon will invariably
leave something glaringly unsaid.
A mere three years after the infamously reclusive author released
Against the Day, a 1,000-plus-page world’s fair of
themes, characters and pastiched genres, Pynchon may have
thrown us his strangest curveball yet by delivering a novel
that is accessible, readable, and relatively short: that is,
rather un- Pynchonesque.
Billed as “stoner noir,” Inherent Vice follows laidback,
ganja-puffing private investigator Doc Sportello—“gumsandle”
for Location, Surveillance, Detection (LSD) Investigations—through
L.A. in the spring of 1970, just when the carefree “psychedelic
sixties” are beginning to curdle under paranoia in the wake
of the Manson Family murders, and crumble at the hands of
cynical corporate developers. In an act of uncommon restraint,
Pynchon maintains the detective novel framing throughout the
story, and playfully injects all the savantish pop-cultural
minutiae, for which he’s known, into the kind of plot Raymond
Chandler or Dashiell Hammett would recognize.
Sportello is a remarkably likeable protagonist, who functions
as a deft embodiment of this confused moment in time. His
hairstyle, wardrobe and marijuana habit make him a product
of the fading counterculture, but he lacks much of that generation’s
naïveté (Pynchon uses plenty of accessory characters to illustrate
that). Some critics have drawn comparisons to the Cohen brothers’
“Dude” from The Big Lebowski, but Sportello is far
from the hapless bum, who, by sheer luck, cracks a ludicrous
case of “in and outs” by parroting other character’s theories.
Although paisley, Doc is cut from a cloth closer to the likes
of Philip Marlowe or Sam Spade (or John Garfield, whom Sportello
himself references as a role model), in that he’s conscious
of the world changing around him, wary of any official story,
competent and collected in the company of dopers, thugs, cops,
rock musicians and dentists. Throughout, Sportello’s just
trying to do his job and live something he’d come to think
of as the good life, but he finds himself “caught in a low-level
bummer . . . about how the Psychedelic Sixties, this little
parenthesis of light, might close after all, and all be lost,
taken back into the darkness.”
It all gets started when Sportello’s ex-old lady Shasta drops
by with a personal request. She’s been sleeping with real-estate
mogul Mickey Wolffman and fears that Wolffman’s wife is attempting
a scam to have him committed to an institution. Sportello
has only just begun to check in on the case when the widow
of a heroin-addicted surf-rock sax player asks Doc to follow
rumors that her husband may still be alive and working as
an undercover government provocateur. That’s when things start
to get convoluted. Through the haze of smoldering joints (which
at first seems gratuitous, but later proves a necessary scene
device), an investigative acid trip (that Doc admits might
have put a few extra kinks in the case), a nightmarish puff
of PCP (the kind of “mickey” a hippie villain would naturally
slip), and a carnival of characters named wonderfully Pynchonesque
things like Japonica Fenway, Jason Velveeta, Puck Beaverton,
and Trillium Fortnight, Sportello finds himself inching closer
and closer, from one unlikely synchronicity to the next, to
the nefarious root of it all: a boat, a rehab center, a tax
dodge for dentists, or Chinese heroin cartel called the “Golden
Fang.”
The premise lends itself wonderfully to Pynchon’s digressive
style, whereby a scene that begins in classic P.I. fashion
can spiral through long-winded reminiscences brought on by
the photo on a postcard, imagined song lyrics by the world’s
only black surf-rock band, or lengthy meditations on unmade
B-movies (Godzilligan’s Island), without losing the
plot’s momentum. It comes, at this point, as a massive understatement,
but Pynchon is above all a master stylist. His set pieces
are at once tight and rollicking, as in a scene where Sportello
arrives incognito and Fletch-like to infiltrate what
he believes to be the Golden Fang’s headquarters, is offered
coke by a womanizing dentist, loses his car to an incompetent
acquaintance, encounters a buxom former client, and ends up
in a car with the lot only to be pulled over by the Cultwatch
department of the LAPD.
On account of Pynchon’s personal secrecy, and because his
novels demand surgically close reading, it’s tempting to read
his novels for clues about the man. Paradoxically, in its
accessibility, Inherent Vice may stand as the closest
thing to nonfiction that the author has attempted. Gordita
Beach, the novel’s oceanfront surf haven, is a clear stand-in
for Manhattan Beach, where Pynchon lived in the late ’60s
while working on Gravity’s Rainbow. The era and setting,
therefore, were clearly formative for the author, but moreover,
Sportello comes off as a sort of comic self-portrait of the
cool operator who can ride that monstrous, multidimensional
wave of history, media, and quantum possibility and still
come out of the water with something approximating a narrative.
Whether there’s moral resolution somewhere in there is kinda
beside the point. If Sportello’s investigative process in
any way mirrors Pynchon’s approach to writing, it’s probably
not coincidental. Then again, with Pynchon (and his novels),
the surest thing might be the biggest ruse.
 |
|