 |
| Photo:
Alicia Solsman |
21st
Century Situationists
Struggling
to figure out what Jon Stewarts Rally to Restore Sanity
was all about? Good.
By
Josh Potter
It
was a strange feeling. Heading uphill from the National
Mall, the din of 215,000 people behind us, my friends and
I walked silently. I’d stood with some of these folks across
from riot cops, tear- gas-buffering bandanas around our
mouths, at the height of the anti-corporate globalization
movement. With others, I’d attended Burning Man, our epoch’s
great more-defying social experiment and alternative to
“default reality.” But I’d never been in a crowd this large
before, nor one so, well, shruggingly matter-of-fact about
its assembly. Back in the car, somebody finally said it,
that they felt like we’d just participated in some generation-defining,
culturally significant event. The trouble—or the beauty—was
the fact nobody could say what that significance was.
To complicate things, my group didn’t really even make it
to the “show.” The Metro was choked with rally-goers, so
we joined the clouds of costumed pedestrians drifting through
the D.C. streets, eventually finding their way past the
White House and the silent no-nukes lady, who’s been camped
out across Pennsylvania Avenue since 1981 in a comparatively
quaint display of direct activism, and down toward the mall.
Along with tens of thousands of late-arrivals, corralled
to the periphery and into a strange sonic dead-zone, our
hopes of actually entering the lawn and witnessing the “event”
were quickly dashed. Somehow, in an era when every minute
detail of reality is documented and made available for instantaneous
viewing, and digital avenues allow for “participation” regardless
of physical presence, that didn’t seem like such a big deal.
But it did make us wonder why it was important to so many
people to actually be there.
Content to watch it all on YouTube later, we wandered the
sea of signs. In a glorious send-up of both Tea Party-co-opted
populism and a prior left-wing inability to consolidate
its grassroots message, Smurfs equated Gargamel to Hitler,
the Joker proclaimed that “God Hates Bats,” and responsible
barbers made their plea to “Shave the Whales.” Echoing the
rally’s official line as a “million moderate march,” some
held signs like “Subtlety Now,” “Change Takes Time,” and
“Don’t Be a Douche.” Somewhat more politically direct were
messages like “Ignorance is not a political position,” “Atlas
Sucked,” “Legalize Gay Pot,” and “The only Beck I listen
to has two turntables and a microphone.” A Muslim woman
held a sign admitting she scared Juan Williams at the airport,
and a man in colonial garb waved a Gadsden flag with the
slogan “OMG! Snake! Help! Snake!”
 |
| Photo:
Alicia Solsman |
In
Jon Stewart’s closing address, dubbed his “Moment of Sincerity,”
the event’s most direct statement of purpose, he poked fun
at “hipper, ironic cats,” who are inclined to put quotation
marks around the event’s “clarion call” for “action,” yet
everything “America’s Most Trusted Newsman” does features
this self-conscious sarcasm and meta-analysis. In fact,
it’s what he’s known for. Far from a repudiation of irony
(better yet, “refudiation,” to echo one Palin-lampooning
sign), Stewart’s “rally” was proof that satire and spectacle
are some of the most potent tools we have in reframing political
discourse by stepping outside its quotation marks. And that,
beyond any specific political agenda, was the rally’s ultimate
goal—a massive performance art piece meant to comment on
the political conversation rather than participate in it,
something members of the crowd were actually more adept
at than the Daily Show cast itself.
Footage of the actual show proved a bit tiresome, a ham-fisted
rendition of the mock-rivalry Stewart and Colbert play out
every night, drained of winking subtlety for the sound bite-happy
mass media that would eventually repackage the event. “It
doesn’t matter what we said or did here today,” Stewart
acknowledged. “It matters what was reported about what we
said or did here today.” So, in a way, with humorously exaggerated
attendance figures and absurdist stagecraft, the more vacuous
the content was, the stronger and more disorienting the
commentary became.
The event was widely cast as a response to Glenn Beck’s
Rally to Restore Honor, which, of course, on many levels
it was. But the excruciating conversation over whether or
not the event was partisan largely misses the point. I believe
the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear is best understood
as a contemporary extension of the French Situationist movement
of the ’60s, a mass inversion of rhetorical logic, meant
to break the spectator’s passivity toward the spectacle
and turn the obscuring force of mass media back on itself.
Using pop cultural references and superficial Internet memes
like the double-rainbow guy and “Hide ya kids, hide ya wife
. . . ” in the context of a once-powerful political forum
was an attempt to wipe the slate clean, to rise above the
fruitless tit-for-tat schoolyard shouting match to which
our political discourse has been reduced by the 24-hour
news cycle and corporate spin-doctoring. Hence the paradoxical
power of a Dadaist sign like “Intentionally Blank” or “Three
Word Slogan.”
Don’t confuse these as statements of bourgeois contentedness
or narcissistic disregard (as many on both the left and
right have). The fact that so many people turned out in-the-flesh
is proof that mobilization is still possible, but this event
proved that control of the streets are no longer the stakes.
It’s the terms of the conversation that are worth rallying
over. And this is not to say that the message is without
fault. Guy Debord would likely roll in his grave to hear
a corporate celeb like Stewart compared to a Situationist.
Stewart erects a faulty dichotomy when he lumps MSNBC in
with Fox News, misses a prime opportunity to start an intelligent
conversation about socialism when he accuses Marxism of
“subverting the Constitution,” and remains limited in his
ability to address the root economic cause of the media
“perpetual-panic conflictinator,” while being contractually
wed to it. But, ultimately, this event wasn’t about Stewart
and nobody came expecting a revolution. The rally’s goals
were perhaps overly modest, and with Republicans reclaiming
the House on Tuesday, it’s hard to see how the conversation
has been affected. But for a moment there, as rally-goers
and newscasters alike struggled to divine significance,
it felt like a quarter-million of us caught the conflictinator
with its pants down.