Back to Metroland's Home Page!
 Site Search
   Search Metroland.Net
 Classifieds
   View Classified Ads
   Place a Classified Ad
 Personals
   Online Personals
   Place A Print Ad
 Columns & Opinions
   Comment
   Looking Up
   Reckonings
   Opinion
   Letters
   Rapp On This
   Best Intelligencer
   State Bulletin
 News & Features
   Newsfront
   Features
   What a Week
   Loose Ends
 Lifestyles
   This Week's Review
   The Dining Guide
   Leftovers
   Scenery
   Tech Life
   Profile
 Cinema & Video
   Weekly Reviews
   The Movie Schedule
 Music
   Listen Here
   Live
   Recordings
   Noteworthy
 Arts
   Theater
   Dance
   Art
   Classical
   Books
   Art Murmur
 Calendar
   Night & Day
   Event Listings
 AccuWeather
 About Metroland
   Where We Are
   Who We Are
   What We Do
   Work For Us
   Place An Ad

China Syndrome

Over the last couple weeks, there’s been a proposed law bouncing around Congress named the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA), which would authorize the federal Department of Justice to block any website that was determined to be “primarily designed” and “has no demonstrable, commercially significant purpose or use other than” to promote copyright and trademark infringement.

The bill would allow the feds to generate a blacklist of domain names and forbid your ISP from transmitting sites associated with that domain name to you. Mostly, this appears to be aimed at foreign sites that are now beyond the reach of U.S. law; operators of websites in the United States can be and are simply sued for infringement, so COICA is not about homegrown sites. Rather COICA would allow a block, at our borders, of websites that the feds convince a court is dedicated to infringement. Note that the law doesn’t target the operators of foreign sites or even the content of the sites that are out of U.S. jurisdiction—it just allows U.S. users’ access to those sites to be blocked.

I wasn’t paying a whole lot of attention to this because I’ve been insanely busy with other stuff, and because the reports I’d been reading indicated that COICA wasn’t likely to get through our profoundly-dysfunctional-and-getting-worse Congress.

But it was irksome. The law would give the government sweeping powers that would change the landscape of the Internet in the United States. You know how we all click our tongues dismissively when we learn that some Asian country has blocked YouTube or Facebook or Google? That’s the arena we’d be getting into. Take this COICA law, add a Christianista/Tea Party executive branch and a bunch of Federalist Society judges, and voila, you’ve got a sanitized Internet.

Looked at another way, if you consider a web domain to be like a newspaper, a television station, or any other media outlet, then this law condones outright censorship. Period.

Last week, COICA was passed unanimously by the Senate Judiciary Committee, after the MPAA, the RIAA, Nike, Nintendo, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, unions, media and everybody else in the business world landed on the members with a bunch of ginned-up statistics and horror stories. These fine American business interests also took special care to brand anyone opposing the bills as un-American coddlers of online thieves. So, which senators voted for the bill? Well, folks like Jeff Sessions, Tom Coburn and John Kyl. And folks like Al Franken, Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer.

Wha? Really? Still, most commentators were saying the bill would likely not get through the entire Senate and certainly wouldn’t make it through the House. So, OK, maybe all these senators were just quietly making sure that their corporate contributors were placated on a vote that ultimately was meaningless.

But Al Franken?

Anyway, on the heels of this vote came news late last week that the Department of Homeland Security had seized more than 80 domains that were suspected of infringing activity. This caused a huge WTF all over the blogosphere because nobody could figure out (1) how the hell DHS did it, and (2), since they did it, why we needed COICA. And then there’s the persistent question we’ve talked about here before: Just what the hell is Homeland Security doing chasing music-file sharers and handbag counterfeiters when there are people out there who really want to blow us up?

The dust hasn’t really settled yet, but this seems to be the story so far: DHS hired a private contractor to figure out a way to convince a judge to order the “seizure” of a bunch of domain names that pointed to a bunch of sites that appeared to have something to do with infringement. The sites that were seized were all .com and .net domains, and there was jurisdiction because the company that oversees .com and .net sites, Verisign, is a U.S. company. Verisign chose not to fight the court orders. Adios, domains! Many of the foreign companies that lost domains have already adopted .info sites and have continued operating, apparently out of the jurisdiction of the court order.

Questions remain, though, because some of the sites, particularly a couple of music sites, don’t appear to be primarily involved with infringement. In fact, two of them, the hip-hop blogs RapGodFathers and Onsmash, regularly post tracks and mix tapes at the request of artists and labels. I’m guessing DHS didn’t tell the judge that.

But the bottom line is that government is helping business by restricting speech. Where I come from, that’s a hallmark of fascism.

—Paul Rapp


Send A Letter to Our Editor
Back Home
   
 
 
Copyright © 2002 Lou Communications, Inc., 419 Madison Ave., Albany, NY 12210. All rights reserved.