 |
| There’s
coming to take me away, ha ha: Portman in Black Swan. |
Dance
My Soul Away
By
John Brodeur
Black
Swan
Directed
by Darren Aronofsky
The
fifth feature from director Darren Aronofsky is a dazzler,
a technically brilliant piece of work that takes the audience
on a rollercoaster emotional ride—only to drop them back at
the gate, nothing gained. In Aronofsky, modern cinema has
a filmmaker who is absolutely uninterested in the concept
of suspense; you know the endings before his movies begin.
So why is it that Black Swan generates such a feeling
of disappointment despite fundamentally sticking to the tried-and-true
formula? Perhaps it’s because, for once, we want something
more.
Nina (Natalie Portman) is a young dancer in a New York City
ballet company under the artistic direction of Thomas Leroy
(Vincent Cassel). She lives with her controlling mother (Barbara
Hershey), a former dancer who is bent on living out her failed
fantasies through her daughter. When Thomas announces that
he will be staging Swan Lake as the first performance
of the new season, and that he will be replacing his star
dancer, Beth MacIntyre (Winona Ryder), he casts Nina as the
Swan Queen. But while she is graceful and technically proficient,
a perfect fit for the innocence of the White Swan, she lacks
the abandon to slip comfortably into the sensual Black Swan
role. However, a new dancer, Lily (Mila Kunis), is exactly
the kind of dancer for the latter, and she and Nina strike
up a strange friendship that leads to personal discovery,
fierce competition, and ultimately Nina’s psychological unraveling.
For a movie about ballet and high-class society, Black
Swan is pretty trashy. The base thrills are many: the
icky, older Thomas coming onto the virginal Nina; the girls
taking ecstasy in a pulsating nightclub; the smug pleasure
one takes in seeing Nina physically assault her overbearing
mother. While it’s all in the name of personal transformation,
at every step we’re reminded that ambition isn’t necessarily
a good thing. She realizes her inherent potential, but to
what end?
All that aside it’s a terrifically shot and acted film. The
graininess of the many nighttime shots create a voyeuristic
quality, lending secondhand to the overall feeling of paranoia.
Often Nina is followed by a camera stationed about a foot
from the base of her neck, giving those scenes an anxious,
manic energy. Aronofsky’s penchant for the preparation sequences
(i.e., the rapid-cut shots of junkies cooking heroin in Requiem
for a Dream) manifests itself in too-close shots of gaunt
dancers cracking their toes or preparing their shoes (it’s
a lot like woodworking). And the few special effects are jarring,
even when purely fantastical.
Hershey and Cassel are frightening but layered; Kunis and
Ryder are good in undemanding roles. But Portman is superb.
It’s a performance that truly deserves all the attention it’s
getting. For once she shows an emotional range that is not
only palpable but realistic. Portman having lost a bunch of
weight for the role, her normally rounded features are thin
and drawn, allowing Nina’s turn to the dark side to really
show in her face.
But ultimately, while Black Swan is what some might
call a tour de force, it’s not all that likeable. Aronofsky’s
film succeeds as a thriller but fails as a story. Where The
Wrestler’s Randy the Ram experienced some amount of redemption
before ultimately thrusting himself into oblivion, Nina Sayers
finds no such peace in her quest. In this world, there’s no
comeuppance for the antagonists, no redemption for Nina’s
lost soul. Thus Black Swan is a film that makes us
care too much but ultimately feel very little. And that is
frustrating as hell.
All
the World’s a Runway
The
Tourist
Directed
by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck
The
Tourist stars Angelina Jolie, Johnny Depp, and costumer
Colleen Atwood. Atwood isn’t in the film, of course, but her
vintage-inspired clothing upstages the faux-thriller plot,
the romance-novel settings, and, almost, the one-dimensional
characters—but since the mysterious, ravishing Elise is played
by Jolie, and her depressed dupe, Frank, is played by Depp,
the stars prove to be as radiant as their wardrobes. This
is important, because The Tourist unfolds like a Vanity
Fair fashion spread, though it isn’t quite as intriguing
as some of the more stylish fashion editorials, the ones that
mimic a movie’s look with props and accessories, and that
throw in an evocatively posed male celebrity to make the ready-to-wear
more mouthwatering. (This explains Depp’s role better than
the screenplay does.)
After receiving handwritten instructions from a past lover
in a Paris cafe, Elise boards a train, perusing each male
passenger until her emerald eyes alight on Frank, sitting
alone with a spy novel. A math teacher from Wisconsin, Frank
is duly poleaxed by Elise’s attentions, and readily accepts
her invitation to share her opulent hotel room in Venice.
If Frank is aware that she’s using him for a diversion, he
doesn’t show it, nor does he suspect that he’s being used
as a strategic, not romantic, diversion. Elise is being followed,
and not just by Scotland Yard. Though Paul Bettany fusses
and fumes photogenically as the British investigator on her
tail, there is someone else even more elusive than Elise lurking
in the background—and he’s wanted for tax evasion!
In contrast to Elise’s luxuriously choreographed sashays (Atwood’s
inspiration ranges from Grace Kelly to Audrey Hepburn to Sophia
Loren), the script is so shopworn and threadbare that a flock
of moths should take flight at her every promenade. The rest
of the cast is remarkably attractive, too: Timothy Dalton
is the Scotland Yard honcho who realizes there is a Russian
mobster involved. Apparently, however, the mobster’s thugs
are around merely to add some thuggish local color, since
they are too incompetent to land even a single shot at Frank
when he’s stumbling across a serrated tile roof in his jammies,
or to overtake Elise when she motorboats to the rescue at
speeds a goldfish could outrace. But damn if she doesn’t look
fetching standing at the prow in a Fair Isle sweater in the
moonlit canal.
Exactly why Elise and Frank both speak and move like narcoleptics
locked in a department store instead of like adversaries in
a Hitchcock-lite romantic thriller is never explained, but
far more bewildering than the mistaken identities that provide
the not-so-surprising ending is how Academy Award-winning
talents like director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck (The
Lives of Others) and screenwriters Julian Fellowes and
Christopher McQuarrie were hoodwinked into taking a backseat
to Atwood’s star glazing.
—Ann
Morrow
 |
| Legal
beat down: Franco in Howl. |
Too
Literal
Howl
Directed
by Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman
To
point out that Howl raises the question, “Why aren’t
there more movies like this?”—that is, movies focused so specifically
on the production and impact of a single work of art—is a
backhanded compliment. Because the movie answers the question,
as well.
Which isn’t to say that the movie is a failure or that it
isn’t worth watching. Neither thing is true. The intent is
admirable; the performances good (one, excellent, but we’ll
come back to that); the subject matter fascinating and enormously
relevant. Nevertheless, I have a quibble. First, though, the
good stuff.
James
Franco, starring as poet Allen Ginsberg, is excellent. The
prettification of historical figures is Hollywood routine,
but the handsome Franco really earned the role. Clearly, he
and the filmmakers know their subject. (In fact, many of the
images in the film are recognizably re-creations of famous
photos of Beat scenes and writers.) Franco is Ginsberg to
a T. So, scenes of the young poet reading “Howl,” prepublication,
for the first time at San Francisco’s Six Gallery in 1955,
are a delightful type of time travel. And later interviews
with Ginsberg about the evolution of the poem are warm, personal
and illuminating. They provide context and background that
make clear how wrongheaded were the legal accusations of obscenity
made against the book’s publisher.
The trial scenes, depicting the obscenity prosecution of that
publisher, poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti, are serviceable—if
not electric. Drawn largely from transcripts of the trial,
these bits feel a bit Ken Burns-y, albeit with more expensive
talent than usually turns up in PBS recreations: Jon Hamm
and David Strathairn as defense and prosecution attorneys,
respectively, and Bob Balaban, as judge, aren’t given a whole
lot to do.
Worse, though—really the movie’s one true fault—is the decision
to pair Franco’s reading of Howl with animation. Rather
than allowing viewers to respond to Franco’s recitation of
the poem, as listeners would have to Ginsberg’s, technically
deft but overly literal cartoon representations are provided.
It’s dreadful—remedial, even.
Forcing a single visual interpretation of the poem on the
audience seems counter to the very point of the trial, which
was that obscenity resides not solely in a work of art but
in the mind of whoever interacts with the art. Meaning is
interpretive. By doing that work for the viewer, the filmmakers
limit the subject they mean to celebrate.
—John
Rodat
Ripping
Yawns
The
Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
Directed
by Michael Apted
My oldest son gets bent out of shape if filmmakers take liberties
with the original written word, so he had a lot of negative
commentary about Part 1 of the last Harry Potter installment.
This is why fading memory can be such a great thing—you’re
less inclined to notice such discrepancies between page and
celluloid in, say, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage
of the Dawn Treader, when it’s been about 12 years since
you read it. And it helps that your 4-year-old companion has
never even picked up the book. We were ready for adventure,
to be transported out of a wet and dreary Albany day into
the storybook enchantment that C.S. Lewis spins.
Well, Dawn Treader is certainly pretty to look at.
It’s all dreamy surfaces and romantic hues, especially Aslan’s
table, set for a buffet and lit by the indigo shadows of midnight
and a bit of incandescence courtesy of a falling star. There’s
a great hulking sea monster and shimmering treasures of gold,
not to mention a glorious teary-eyed dragon, all of which
make for some true visual splendor. But the story, involving
the two youngest Pevensie children’s last adventure in Narnia,
is largely devoid of bite and action. Lucy (Georgie Henly)
and Edmund (Skandar Keynes) have been left in war-torn London
until such time when it’s safe to reunite with the rest of
their family, now in America. Ed yearns to fight in battle,
and Lucy longs for a boy to fancy her, but neither gets what
they want. Making things worse are their living arrangements
with a faceless aunt and uncle and their quite irritating
cousin, Eustace (Will Poulter), who mocks the Pevensie infatuation
with fairy tales, magic and anything Narnian. Eustace is indeed
a charmless little bugger, but his incessant journal entries
make for the movie’s only bite and, indeed, edgy humor.
A leaking portrait on the wall transports Lucy, Edmund and
Eustace to an ocean, where they are rescued by Prince Caspian
(Ben Barnes) and the crew of the Dawn Treader. While Reepicheep
(the voice of Simon Pegg) tries to muster Eustace into something
approaching usefulness, the rest seek the seven magic swords
of an equal number of missing Lords who have disappeared in
a quest to rid the land of a terrible curse. While the idea
of tracking down those swords and their errant owners is worthy
of a good children’s adventure, director Michael Apted doesn’t
get much from the pedestrian script written by Christopher
Markus, Stephen McFeely and Michael Petroni. Near the end,
I asked my little boy if he thought there would be “one more
battle,” and he said, very gravely, “but there hasn’t been
one yet,” which brought me up short with the realization that,
no, there hadn’t been anything approaching the grand battles
of the first two installments.
Lewis’s novels plumb the emotional depths of a child’s vivid
imagination, which makes Eustace’s early resistance to such
wonderment both annoying and essential to a compelling ending.
Poulter is truly frightful, but at the same time, I loved
him in much the same way I loved Freddie Bartholomew, who
played a similar spoiled brat in Captains Courageous.
Edmund gets to aim his sword at the sea creature and Lucy
gets to offer words of wisdom to a lost waif, but Eustace
gets the true and transforming adventure; I was cheering him
on for remembering what needed to be done. Lucy and Edmund’s
final farewell to Aslan (voiced again by Liam Neeson) and
Caspian does convey the melancholy of growing up and leaving
childhood things behind, while underscoring Lewis’ theological
themes. Too bad this emotional ending had such little narrative
meat before it.
—Laura
Leon
|