Back to Metroland's Home Page!
 Site Search
   Search Metroland.Net
   View Classified Ads
   Place a Classified Ad
   Online Personals
   Place A Print Ad
 Columns & Opinions
   Looking Up
   Rapp On This
   Best Intelligencer
   State Bulletin
 News & Features
   What a Week
   Loose Ends
   This Week's Review
   The Dining Guide
   Tech Life
 Cinema & Video
   Weekly Reviews
   The Movie Schedule
   Listen Here
   Art Murmur
   Night & Day
   Event Listings
 About Metroland
   Where We Are
   Who We Are
   What We Do
   Work For Us
   Place An Ad

Cutting the Night Short

Early-closing concept falls as flat as stale beer with Albany bar owners

It’s 4 AM on Sunday morning at Blue 82, and the loud crowd is still going strong as the lights come on.

“Things start late in this town,” says Mike Ripley, owner of the Pearl Street bar. “Bands don’t start till late. DJs come on late. People have their first drink at one or two in the morning. We’re very busy right up until four. We literally have to take the drinks out of everybody’s hand. Under New York state law, at four o’clock, legally you cannot have any consumption in the bar at all.”

In an effort to improve public safety, Albany Mayor Jerry Jennings has asked bar and club owners to make last call two hours earlier than state law dictates. The mayor proposed changing closing time from 4 AM to 2 AM during separate meetings this month with management of uptown and downtown drinking establishments.

“What we’re hoping to really effect is to reduce the number of victims,” Police Chief Steven Krokoff said.

A statistical analysis of robberies, assaults, aggravated assaults and sexual assaults between 2 AM and 5 AM showed that a majority of crimes—about 60 percent—occurred within 500 feet of bars compared to citywide, the chief said.

“The time period between 11 AM and 2 AM had a much lesser incidence of those crimes,” he said.

Bar owners worry that a 2 AM closing could drive their business to other jurisdictions, such as Troy or Schenectady. Early closing could also lead to rowdy after-hours house parties in residential neighborhoods, they said. Some tavern owners thought crime would persist no matter when the bars close.

“It doesn’t matter what time it is,” said Ginger Berlin, owner of Anna O’Keefe’s. “In my opinion, I think the problem is the college kids. They’re primarily the victims. They get really trashed. They walk and they get mugged. The city is more into community policing instead of policing policing. They need to be a little stricter with the punks that roam the streets. Having more police officers on the streets would help, more patrols even.”

In this tough economy, it’s not just club owners who might lose money if the doors close at 2 AM, said Francis Verret, owner of Red Square, a live entertainment venue on Broadway.

“It’s also a lot of sales tax revenue that the government would lose,” he said. “I personally never want to cut back on potential business hours. As a small business owner, that’s not really a smart idea. If a small business is making $100 per hour, that’s $200 a night lost in the register. If he’s open five nights a week, that’s a large sum of money at the end of the year that might mean the difference between closing and surviving.”

Peter Agostinello, general manager of Water Works on Central Avenue, vowed to campaign against an earlier closing time, claiming it wouldn’t work.

“We don’t feel that closing the bars at 2 AM is going to curtail crime,” he said. “London, England, used to close its bars at 11 PM and there would be a last minute rush at 10:30. Revelers would binge drink, order five pints and a couple shots, and spill out onto the streets. It would be absolute mayhem. They were forcing people into the streets. They weren’t ready to go home that early. They were not given time to wind down. The later they stayed open, the less crime they had.”

A controlled environment is the key, Agostinello believes. For instance, he said, Water Works cards everyone at the door with an age verification machine. It breathalyses and bounces underage patrons who come in smelling of liquor. It also trains its bartenders to detect excessive inebriation and flag drunks without provoking them.

Bar owners and managers have met twice in recent weeks to come up with their own strategies for making things safer, said Chris Pratt, co-owner of the Pearl Street Pub and Dirty Martini Lounge. The group expects to present its ideas to Mayor Jennings within a matter of weeks.

“We’ve taken what the mayor said to heart,” Pratt said. “How can we contribute and also how can the city help us? The city wants to have a thriving downtown nightlife. From a financial standpoint, we’re business owners. Our culture has totally been predicated on going out at 11:30 or 12 o’clock on a weekend. A good percentage of our business is done between the hours of 2 and 4. If we were going to close at 2, we’d have to start shutting down at 1:30. If it were statewide, OK, but in one particular area, it would be a hard thing to swallow.”

Mike Philip is general manager of Jillian’s, a large club on North Pearl Street.

“We’re working with the mayor on finding a solution to make downtown safer and to try and get families and respectable clientele back here,” he said. “Apparently, there’s been more crime than he’s comfortable with. We want downtown to be a place where people can come out to dinner, go see a show and come have a drink afterwards.”

—Laurie Lynn Fischer

The Party’s Overspent

State Senate Democrats didn’t just lose their majority; they lost control of their finances


New York State Senate Democrats have come under scrutiny lately for the way they manage their own finances. The outgoing majority and the party’s senatorial campaign committee both seem to have been spending far beyond their means for more than a year.

Exact totals are still unknown, but monthly expenditures appear to have been $1.1 million more than the $2.3 million that was allocated for Democratic Senate staffing. This is primarily due to the Senate coup of two years ago that left the Democrats briefly without power when three Democratic senators voted with the Republican bloc. The insurgent senators eventually returned to ranks, but not before upsetting the balance of leadership within the party. One result of this struggle was increased spending for new party leaders and additional monies provided to senate Republicans.

Some of the money was spent on undisclosed expenses for then-Sen. Pedro Espada (D-Bronx), who benefited significantly from the events of 2009, and the failure to reduce the staff of Sen. Malcolm Smith (D-Queens) after he was replaced as majority leader. This has caused anger among some senators on both sides of the aisle.

There is also reason to believe that this spending behavior contributed to the recent split of four Democratic senators from the main party. The newly formed Independent Democratic Conference is composed of Jeffrey Klein (Bronx/Westchester), Diane Savino (Staten Island/Brooklyn), David Valesky (Oneida) and David Carlucci (Rockland). Many of the things the IDC is championing are fiscally based, including the call to streamline government and curb wasteful spending, although Klein has been accused of being just as culpable as the rest of the Democratic leadership.

“There was some additional money available,” said Sen. Neil Breslin (D-Albany), the new deputy minority leader and Democratic chairman of the transition committee. “When the Republicans won in November, they came to the transition committee and told us that we had to reduce our spending to get it back in line and, coincidentally, today is that day,” he said Wednesday,” said Breslin. “We were spending at a rate of $41 million and had to get down to $28 million by January 19.” He also said that, as of Tuesday, they had brought the budget back down to well under that figure.

Breslin attributed the savings to belt-tightening and restricted spending, the reduction in party leadership and attendant staffing costs, as well as the “unfortunate” widespread layoffs. He specifically mentioned the absence of Espada as a significant source of savings. “He was beaten,” said Breslin. “Thankfully.”

In addition to governmental budgetary woes, the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee overshot its budget by approximately $3 million last year. Somewhat ironically, most of that money went to outside consulting businesses during the generally unsuccessful campaign season. Most notably, the Parkside Group received more than 80 percent of DSCC business following the removal of Red Horse Strategies as the committee’s main consultant. DSCC executive director Josh Cherwin has raised some eyebrows over his management of committee contracts and finances—most notably due to an audit he claimed to have done but was never able to produce.

Mentioning that Jeff Klein had been in charge of the committee for the last few years, Breslin acknowledged that there had “been arguments back and forth,” but also said that a number of close campaigns during the midterm elections had become very expensive. “Democrats overspent. You can point fingers, but now our job is to get rid of that debt.”

Klein was unable to be reached for comment in time for publication.

When asked how the committee would close the gap in time for the next election cycle, Breslin (who is now a deputy chair of the DSCC) stated flatly, “Fundraising.” He also expressed confidence in the new Chairman of DSCC, Michael Gianaris. “I expect him to do a wonderfully good job. He’s very capable.”

—Ali Hibbs

Loose Ends

-no loose ends this week-

Send A Letter to Our Editor
Back Home
Copyright © 2002 Lou Communications, Inc., 419 Madison Ave., Albany, NY 12210. All rights reserved.