|
Talking
Back to
the City
By Rick Marshall
How
local government works—and how to make it work for you
photos
by John Whipple
The
big day is over, the campaigning’s done and the polls are
closed. So what’s a soul to do with all that leftover political
energy? Well, as the old saying goes, “All politics is local.”
>From
the historic formalities of Albany’s Common Council to the
loose, familiar tone of Schenectady’s legislative body, the
forms local government take are as varied as the peoples they
serve. Metroland spent the last few months making the
rounds of our largest cities’ council meetings and asking
the elected officials and city residents we found there to
talk about local government and the public’s place in it.
“If
you’re going to be an elected official in this city, you’ve
got to be prepared to be peppered, skewered and roasted by
people,” laughed Schenectady Mayor Brian Stratton while discussing
his city’s raucous council meetings. “And then you’ve still
got to be willing to help them.”
In Schenectady, like many other cities and towns around the
Capital Region, meetings of the city’s legislative branch
provide more than just an opportunity for the public to voice
its opinion on legislation—they’re also a window on the city
itself.
>From
financial woes to government corruption and industry exodus,
the “Electric City” has had its share of hard knocks in recent
years. Much like the city itself, meetings of the City Council
are a lesson in utilizing scarce resources, with council members
sharing microphones and struggling along with those in attendance
to be heard over the sound of the noisy heating and cooling
units rigged up around the room. There’s an air of simmering
frustration, and roughly 20-25 city residents show up twice
monthly to send four-minute bursts of criticism—and, on rare
occasions, compliments—across a short railing to their elected
representatives. City officials quietly absorb the verbal
barrage, only to respond at the end of the meeting to the
assorted criticisms heaped upon them.
It’s the sort of meeting that would seem more appropriate
in a small town, as attendees tend to leave the traditional
etiquette of government meetings at the door, choosing instead
to lob harsh words at council members whom they address on
a first-name basis.
“True
democracy is when you listen to the people on this side of
the rail,” announced Vince Riggi, a lifetime resident of Schenectady,
during a recent meeting. After noticing that the fans scheduled
to be installed in the council had been placed on the city
officials’ side of the room, he added loudly, “There’s enough
hot air blowing around over there—why not put some fans on
our side?”
Riggi, who has been attending City Council meetings for nearly
11 years, first approached the council when he got wind of
a plan for a new baseball field that involved dumping waste
into a ravine near his home. The plan would have destroyed
not only the ravine, but also a popular path from the old
park to surrounding neighborhoods.
“When
I was growing up around there, we used to ride our bikes on
that path,” he explains. “So I started going down to [City
Council] meetings to talk about why I thought it was a bad
idea. . . . Naturally, when you’re sitting through the meetings
and waiting for your chance to speak you hear about other
issues, and so my interest got piqued.”
Since then, Riggi and other “regulars” at City Council meetings
have achieved somewhat of a “local hero” status, due in no
small part to the broadcast of each council meeting over the
county’s public-access channel. During the meetings’ public
comment period, Riggi and fellow residents such as Patricia
Zollinger, whose Web-based bulletin board www.schenectadyny.info
has provided a forum for city residents and officials to voice
their Schenectady-based rants and raves, are often the recipients
of round after round of applause from the public in attendance.
While Riggi reluctantly admits that the whole “local hero”
label is nice, he insists that the public would be better
served if the people who stopped him around the city to pat
his back would make time to join him at meetings.
“I
tell them, ‘Listen, come down here—we could use your help,’”
he explains. “When there are new people in the room, the politicians
take note.”
And on this point, Riggi and Stratton—often at odds with one
another during meetings—have found some agreement. Throughout
the meetings, the mayor frequently steps out of the chambers
to discuss some of the more immediate complaints like loitering
or other public safety issues that residents bring to the
floor.
“I
don’t think any city council provides as much opportunity
for people to speak, be heard and be seen—or for them to be
famous in their own right,” says Stratton. “[For city officials],
once you’ve been skewered on live public-access television
in front of that many people, you certainly feel compelled
to respond as soon as possible.”
The colorful nature of Schenectady’s meetings stands in sharp
contrast to those of Albany and, to a lesser extent, those
of Troy and Saratoga Springs.
During the meetings of Albany’s Common Council, it’s difficult
to ignore the layers of history that dominate the atmosphere.
Under high, gold-leaved ceilings, ornate furniture fills the
council chambers, and the council president and other city
officials gaze down upon the remaining council members and
public from a massive, elevated desk. City residents are allotted
five minutes apiece to speak at the beginning of the meeting,
and city affairs tend to move briskly, in a flurry of parliamentary
procedure, once the public comment period is over. Unlike
his Schenectady counterpart, Albany Mayor Jerry Jennings is
rarely present at the meetings.
While
Schenectady’s meetings occasionally stray from the standard
rules of order, one gets the feeling that strict adherence
to tradition has been the lifeblood of meetings in the state’s
capital city for decades—a condition that, like the furnishings,
reflects the city’s long and storied political history. According
to council President Helen Desfosses, the intimidation factor
that such an environment creates has not gone unnoticed.
“When
I first became president, I tried to move all of our seats
down on the same level instead of having us sitting way above
everyone else,” explains Desfosses. The city’s historic commission
blocked the room rearrangement. Still, Desfosses insists that
she continues to make every effort possible to create a “warm
and inviting atmosphere” in the council chambers.
“But,”
she added, “our council chamber is part of a historic building,
so we’re limited in the changes we can make.”
Although the average public attendance at Albany’s council
meetings ranks among the lowest of Capital Region cities,
when an issue hits close to home, there’s no shortage of voices
clamoring to be heard.
“We
get people that are activated—and agitated—by a single issue,”
said Desfosses of the difference between Albany residents’
attendance and that of other cities or towns. While places
like Schenectady and Troy have a small group of residents
who attend each and every meeting of the local government,
attendance at Albany Common Council meetings is more agenda-dependent.
“They’ll show up here throughout the whole legislative process
. . . for as long as the issue is on our agenda, sometimes
week after week for a year.”
And, just like in other cities, their efforts occasionally
have dramatic results.
City officials and residents of many of the region’s local
governments are quick to describe laundry lists of city actions
that might never have occurred were it not for local residents’
decision to go public with their concerns during meetings.
In addition to addressing some of the more immediate complaints—such
as road repair and general quality-of-life issues—recent investigations
into police corruption were mentioned by both Albany and Schenectady
officials as products of public participation in city meetings.
Of course, sudden bursts of public attendance can occasionally
put local governments in a tough position, too. In Troy, when
members of the Police Benevolent Association showed up en
masse at a recent City Council meeting in order to pressure
the council to pass the PBA’s pay-raise legislation, many
members’ discomfort with the “nudge” being applied to standard
procedure was evident. Despite council members’ complaints
that they were afforded too little time to study the bill’s
contents, the measure was passed in a hectic meeting that
included an adjournment, impromptu drafting of the new legislation
and numerous questions as to what exactly the standard practice
might be in such a situation. Several members of the public
who attended the event were skeptical of the council’s actions,
characterizing the night’s events as a local government being
bullied by its police force.
In contrast, members of a community-media-advocacy group who
spoke during a meeting of the Saratoga Springs City Council
appeared to give council members the nudge necessary to set
aside funds for development of the region’s public access
network—a move that many in attendance viewed as a positive
step for the community that otherwise might not have been
made without the groups’ participation in local government.
However, as most longtime participants in local government
will attest, swaying the opinion of your elected officials
tends to be a hard-fought battle—a battle that, in many cases,
can require more time and energy than some residents are willing
to sacrifice.
“People
are afraid of investing the time it takes to see an issue
through,” explains Riggi, who, prior to a organizing a recent
rally on the steps of City Hall, admitted that he had been
growing disillusioned with city residents’ apathy. The event,
arranged as a protest of the garbage fee recently added to
residents’ already-high taxes, attracted a surprisingly large
crowd of more than 200 people.
“It
really buoyed my spirits,” he laughs, adding, “I guess it
just goes to show you—people only get active when they’re
angry and frustrated.”
For some city residents, the primary obstacle to airing their
concerns is not a lack of subject matter, but a fear of the
potential response.
“One
of the best aspects about these meetings,” explains Desfosses,
“is that people say what they want to say, and cannot be interrupted,
fought with or argued with during that time.”
According to Riggi, some residents’ fears center on more sinister
forms of reprisal.
“I’ve
heard people say that they think their garbage won’t get picked
up or they’ll get ticketed if they speak up at meetings,”
says Riggi, who argues that the more vocal a member of the
public is, the less likely he or she will be targeted by the
powers that be.
“Knowing
that you’re not going to cower and hide under your bed at
the first sign of resistance is an extra layer of protection,”
says Riggi. “Sure, speaking up isn’t for everybody, but you
can still show up and show your support. When you open your
hearts—and your ears—to the plights of your neighbors, it
does a world of good for the community.”
rmarshall@metroland.net
|