| 
  Inherit 
                    the Wind 
To 
                    the Editor: 
 I 
                    found Tom Nattells critique of the New Choices for Green 
                    Energy being offered by Niagara Mohawk in their September 
                    utility bills [The Simple Life, Oct. 10] generally accurate 
                    and interesting, with one major exception. 
 
                    Unfortunately, Tom lumped the three renewable energy providers 
                    (Community Energy, Green Mountain, and Sterling Planet) into 
                    one negative assessment of Niagara Mohawks green power 
                    offer without recognizing that one, Community Energy, has 
                    a solid track record of creating real, new wind power resources. 
 
                    Yes, Tom is correct in stating that Community Energy was founded 
                    only in 1999. In those three short years, their first demonstration 
                    project was oversubscribed by 800 percent. Their first success 
                    in showing the publics desire for clean, renewable wind energy 
                    resources led to the construction of a 9-million-watt wind 
                    farm in Somerset, Pa., at the time the largest wind farm east 
                    of the Mississippi.  
 
                    Community Energys marketing resulted in Carnegie Mellon University 
                    becoming the first university to purchase the entire output 
                    of one of the new 1.5-mw wind turbine, and that started a 
                    movement that sold out the entire 9-mw wind farm and created 
                    the consumer demand that built another 15 mw of new wind energy 
                    in Mill Run, Pa. Penn State then bought the output of three 
                    of the new turbines from Community Energy, followed soon after 
                    by the University of Pennsylvania (whose five-turbine purchase 
                    is currently the largest wind purchase in the country).  
 
                    These leading institutions were joined by a total of 31 Pennsylvania 
                    colleges and universities, plus state and local government 
                    agencies, nonprofits, businesses, and thousands of individual 
                    residents who are willing to pay the small premium to bring 
                    clean, renewable wind energy to replace the brown power that 
                    currently supplies our electricity.  
 
                    In Albany, leading environmental organizations including Environmental 
                    Advocates and NYPIRG have researched the options and signed 
                    up for Community Energys New Wind Energy product because 
                    they found that Community Energy is selling wind generated 
                    electricity from the Fenner Wind Farm in Madison County (just 
                    east of Syracusecurrently the largest east of the Mississippi). 
                    Small businesses including the Daily Grind and Shades of Green 
                    have been joined by the University of Buffalo, Hobart and 
                    William Smith Colleges, Penguin Putnam publishers, and more 
                    than 3,000 Niagara Mohawk and NYSEG customers.  
 
                    These institutions, companies, nonprofits and residents all 
                    realize that their purchase of new wind energy will create 
                    the market demand that can expand New Yorks wind power base 
                    from the existing 50 mw to the potential 10,000 mw of land 
                    and offshore wind resources (about 20 percent of New Yorks 
                    current electrical usage).  
 
                    It is true that Community Energy teamed up with Exelon to 
                    build the Pennsylvania wind turbines. While growing quickly, 
                    were still a small company that needs the financial backing 
                    of larger corporations to cover the $1.5 million cost of each 
                    new 1.5-mw wind turbine. Our perspective is that, if enough 
                    consumers prove their real desire for new, renewable energy 
                    resources by putting their money where their hearts are, then 
                    consumer demand will create the market that will push out 
                    the nonrenewables.  
 
                    As an energy professional for 20 years, I urge Tom to install 
                    the efficiency measures he spoke about, because we in America 
                    still waste half the energy we use.  
 
                    However, while I spent over a decade installing energy efficiency 
                    measures for nonprofits, businesses, government, and international 
                    agencies, the one thing that always bothered me was that, 
                    no matter how much energy we saved, the rest was coming from 
                    polluting, nonrenewable sources.  
 
                    When I look at my kids and see the impacts of smog, acid rain, 
                    the hole in the ozone, and global warming, I am thrilled that 
                    I finally have the opportunity for my household to become 
                    100-percent wind powered for only $10 more per month (our 
                    monthly usage of 400 kwh at 2.5 cents) 
 
                    Clean energy is here. For the first time in our lifetimes, 
                    individual consumers can have new, clean wind energy if we 
                    step up and pay just a little bit extra. If enough of us pay 
                    the small premium now, we can change our energy mix and make 
                    wind power competitive to fossil fuel and nuclear power sources 
                    within a few years. 
 Ron 
                    Kamen 
New 
                    York state director, Community Energy, Inc. 
Binghamton 
Peace 
                    Is a Two-Way Street 
 To 
                    the Editor: 
 The 
                    letters to the editor in Metroland [Sept. 19, Oct. 
                    3, Oct. 10] highlight why peace has been so elusive in the 
                    Middle East.  
 
                    Both the Israelis and Palestinians can rightfully be described 
                    as victims. Each side has been used as proxies by their so-called 
                    backers to further their own interests. Each side can readily 
                    cite historical incidences of violence and oppression by each 
                    other. Peace will never be found by looking backward but only 
                    by moving forward. 
 
                    Each side in such disputes is always better at detailing the 
                    wrongs committed by the other side than in acknowledging their 
                    own failures and shortcomings. Violence is never a justification 
                    for more violence or oppression. Every act of violence is 
                    an admission of failure, a weakening of the righteousness 
                    of the cause in whose name the violence is committed, one 
                    more step in transforming the victim into the oppressor. 
 
                    Both sides must strengthen their commitment to end violence. 
                    Israel must end the occupation of Palestinian territories. 
                    The soul of any nation, particularly one espousing democratic 
                    ideals, is invariably stained through the act of enforcing 
                    a military occupation. The Palestinian people must denounce 
                    the use of suicide bombings, following instead the path of 
                    Gandhi and King in engaging in nonviolent protest. And while 
                    the Palestinian people must be free to choose their own leadership, 
                    they have not been well served by their present leaders. Nor 
                    have the Israelis. 
 
                    There will never be peace in the Middle East as long as the 
                    United States government favors one side over the other, and 
                    as long as U.S. support, including propping up corrupt Arab 
                    governments such as Saudi Arabia, is determined by military 
                    and oil considerations rather than commitment to justice, 
                    democracy and individual rights. The United States should 
                    support the deployment of peacekeepers, preferably unarmed, 
                    in the occupied territories. The U.S. should ensure the long-term 
                    security of both the Israeli and Palestinian people. And a 
                    final settlement must include a just resolution to a myriad 
                    of issues, including access to water and arable land. 
 Mark 
                    Dunlea 
Chair, 
                    Green Party of New York State 
A 
                    Ritter Wrapped in a Mystery 
 To 
                    the Editor: 
 Here 
                    are two things we (still) dont know about Scott Ritter [Show 
                    Me the Weapons Violations, Oct. 3]. 
 
                    Who is paying for his globetrotting? 
 
                    Why would the U.S. government think that he might be a spy 
                    for Israel? 
 
                    Maybe your reporter was going to ask Ritter these questions 
                    and was just intimidated by his table slamming. 
 
                    Here is one thing we do know about Ritter. He recently gave 
                    a speech to the Iraqi Congress. In this speech he criticized 
                    his government and he accused his president of lying. He gave 
                    this speech at a time when his hosts were trying to shoot 
                    down American pilots patrolling the no-fly zone. 
 
                    Ritters transition from an ex-Marine and a registered Republican 
                    to an Iraqi stooge appears to be breathtakingly complete. 
 David 
                    Riley 
Albany 
Just 
                    Make It Legal 
 To 
                    the Editor: 
 I 
                    have been reading with passing interest the squabbles between 
                    the Green and Marijuana Reform parties, and while I certainly 
                    feel compassion toward those who have a genuine medical need 
                    for cannabis, I am also among those who were deeply disillusioned, 
                    not so much when the rallying cry turned from legalization 
                    into decriminalization in the early 1970s, but by the trend 
                    that came after that: Dump decrim too in favor of industrial 
                    and medical legalization exclusively. 
 
                    The whole purpose of the decrim movement was to prevent responsible, 
                    job-holding persons from having their lives literally ruined 
                    for daring to bring small, personal amounts of marijuana out 
                    into the street instead of keeping it behind closed doors 
                    like most would do for say, snorting cocaine or having sex. 
                    In other words, the movement completely, instead of partially, 
                    caved in to the neo-puritanical mentality instead of making 
                    tactical alliances with various groups opposed to it, from 
                    the rational pro-choice movement to the gays and Larry Flynts 
                    alike. I blame this failure on a society tragically polarized 
                    between reactionism and political correctness with little 
                    or nothing in between. 
 
                    Although I voted for Tom Golisano in Septembers Independence 
                    Party primary (my official party affiliation as far as New 
                    York state goes) in an effort to keep Gov. George Patakis 
                    name off the ticket this November, and though I am no longer 
                    a card-carrying member of the Libertarian Party, this gubernatorial 
                    year my vote will go to their candidate Scott Jeffery for 
                    the singular reason that he has vocally attacked not only 
                    the senseless drug wars, but the equally ridiculous and baseless 
                    cultural wars too. 
 
                    Finally, my idea of an ideal cannabis policy that is neither 
                    status-quo nor libertarian purist would be as follows: Legalize 
                    the stuff de factowhether the medical need is there or notfor 
                    adults, but keep it about the same price as the black market 
                    currently offers. This relatively high price would go down 
                    toward public medical care, giving the poor the advantages 
                    of socialized medicine, but without burdening the taxpayers 
                    with the tab. Also make it legal to grow a certain number 
                    of plants for personal use only, the same way one can legally 
                    brew ones own beer and wine, but cannot legally sell without 
                    a special license. 
 Bernard 
                    Continelli 
Rensselaer 
Metroland 
                    welcomes typed, double-spaced letters (computer printouts 
                    OK), addressed to the editor. Or you may e-mail them to: . 
                    Metroland reserves the right to edit letters for length; 300 
                    words is the preferred maximum. You must include your name, 
                    address and day and evening telephone numbers. We will not 
                    publish letters that cannot be verified, nor those that are 
                    illegible, irresponsible or factually inaccurate.  
Send 
                      to:  
                      Letters, Metroland, 4 Central Ave.,  
                      4th Floor, Albany, NY 12210  
                      or e-mail us at . 
 
 
 |