Back to Metroland's Home Page!
 Site Search
   Search Metroland.Net
 Classifieds
   View Classified Ads
   Place a Classified Ad
 Personals
   Online Personals
   Place A Print Ad
 Columns & Opinions
   Comment
   Looking Up
   Reckonings
   Opinion
   Letters
   Rapp On This
   Best Intelligencer
 News & Features
   Newsfront
   Features
   What a Week
   Loose Ends
 Lifestyles
   This Week's Review
   The Dining Guide
   Leftovers
   Scenery
   Tech Life
   Profile
   The Over-30 Club
 Cinema & Video
   Weekly Reviews
   The Movie Schedule
 Music
   Listen Here
   Live
   Recordings
   Noteworthy
 Arts
   Theater
   Dance
   Art
   Classical
   Books
   Art Murmur
 Calendar
   Night & Day
   Event Listings
 AccuWeather
 About Metroland
   Where We Are
   Who We Are
   What We Do
   Work For Us
   Place An Ad

Stay of deportation: Saugerties-based restaurateurs Emilio and Analia Maya.

Photo: Alicia Solsman

Back in Business (for Now)

Saugerties restaurant owners get temporary reprieve from deportation orders

To the relief of friends and patrons, the owners of the Tango Café in Saugerties have been granted temporary stays of deportation. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency granted Emilio Maya a stay of one year, and an immigration judge granted a stay of his sister Analia Maya’s deportation for at least seven months.

As reported in Metroland [“Immigrants’ Dilemma,” Feb. 18], the Mayas, who had been undocumented immigrants, worked as informants for ICE from 2005 to 2009 in exchange for the agency’s promise of “legal status.” The agency issued them work permits in 2006 but told them last June that the permits would be revoked because ICE was moving its operations to Newburgh. The pair enlisted the help of U.S. Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-Saugerties) and, in August, Hinchey began communicating with the agency about their case.

Then on Nov. 17, ICE agents detained and attempted to summarily deport Emilio Maya; his deportation was stayed for 90 days after Hinchey intervened. The same day her brother was detained, ICE scheduled a March 5 removal hearing for Analia Maya in immigration court.

On Feb. 5, Hinchey introduced a rare private bill in Congress that, if passed, would allow the Mayas to obtain visas. The bill’s introduction apparently was the chief reason ICE granted the stay of Emilio Maya’s deportation. And at Analia Maya’s March 5 court hearing, immigration judge Robert Weisel granted a continuation of her case until Sept. 10 to allow time for the fate of Hinchey’s bill to be determined.

After receiving the stay from ICE on Feb. 19, Emilio Maya told the Kingston Daily Freeman, “I can’t describe how I feel. There is such happiness in my heart. All our grief, you forget it in a second with news like this.” Following her hearing on March 5, Analia Maya said that she felt really good because “we need time.”

But the Mayas’ recent victories are only a reprieve. According to Hinchey’s chief of staff Jeff Lieberson, in the current political climate, it will be “very, very difficult to get the representative’s bill through the entire House.”

It’s also impossible for the Mayas to return to life as it was before last November. Because Emilio Maya is under an order of supervision, he must report to the ICE field office in Manhattan every few months. When Maya did so on March 1, the hearing officer told him that his circumstances are irrelevant and that his only chance to avoid deportation in February 2011 will be to have ICE assist him in obtaining an S-visa. Known on the street as “snitch visas,” these are granted to undocumented immigrants who assist law-enforcement agencies in prosecuting crime or terrorism.

Under the law, an immigrant may be considered for an S-visa if he or she shares information with a law enforcement agency about a criminal enterprise that is essential to an agency investigation or prosecution. The undercover missions that the Mayas describe having done for ICE—including infiltrating drug, gang and human-smuggling operations—would appear to fit that requirement, and the Mayas say that their ICE handlers praised their undercover work.

But ICE has shown no indication that it is willing to sponsor the Mayas for S-visas, despite their years of service. And the Mayas recently discovered that the agency may never have had any intention of granting them permanent legal status. The removal-hearing document with which Analia Maya was served last November is dated Oct. 18, 2006, only a few weeks after the Mayas began working on the riskiest assignments for ICE, a piece of information that Judge Weisel said during Analia Maya’s hearing he found “interesting.” It appears that ICE was preparing for the Mayas’ removal at the very time that they were putting their lives on the line for the agency—suggesting a lack of willingness to ever grant them legal status.

Recent media reports have documented that ICE took a similar approach in managing dozens of other undocumented informants. A Feb. 12 Los Angeles Times article, for example, reported that the agency is attempting to deport Salvadoran informant Ernest Gamboa, who complained when the agency stopped paying him last year. According to the office of Sen. Maria Cantwell [D-Wash.], Gamboa’s work for ICE resulted in at least 90 drug busts. ICE spokesman Brandon Alvarez Montgomery did not respond to Metroland’s request for information about how many informants ICE sponsored for S-visas last year or the criteria the agency use to determine when to assist an informant in obtaining an S-visa.

At least one national immigrant-rights group is criticizing ICE’s treatment of informants. On Feb. 16, the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders—representing 20,000 evangelical churches in 34 states—passed an emergency resolution demanding that Department of Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano “make public the criteria that immigration agents use to recruit informants.” The resolution also calls on Congress to hold hearings in which informants can describe their work and how they were treated by the agency.

If that happens, Emilio and Analia Maya’s story could become a case study of whether changes are needed in ICE policies toward informants.

—Steve Yoder


No Cheerleading Tonight

Breslin can’t find a way to put a positive spin on the dire state of Albany County

 

Albany County Executive Michael Breslin gave his annual State of the County Address Monday night. The message, unsurprisingly, was bleak. “We are in extremely challenging economic times,” said the executive. “States, local governments and people across the nation are facing the greatest economic challenges since the Great Depression. Albany County is not immune.”

After recognizing the county employees currently serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, Breslin immediately began detailing the current economic state of Albany County: The unemployment rate is the highest on record; the price of homes has fallen 6.5 percent; sales-tax receipts have fallen by $11 million; and 10,000 people have lost their jobs in the last year alone. Compounding these problems is the coinciding increase in demand for public services, a nearly 50-percent increase in food stamps issued, and a 20-percent increase in both temporary and emergency assistance.

“The precipitous drops in sales tax revenues, the delays and cuts in state reimbursements and the increase in demand for all public assistance services are placing an extraordinary strain on our operations. If we don’t take action, that burden will be passed on to county property taxpayers,” said Breslin, inviting the legislators to a meeting later in the month to “discuss our fiscal situation and the difficult options we face.” He also mentioned a resolution that was scheduled to go before the legislature for a vote at the monthly meeting following his address.

Resolution No. 121 provides for the creation of a special budget committee “to evaluate and make recommendations concerning all matters which the committee may deem appropriate relating to financial solvency and cost containment measures.” The resolution was adopted, but an amendment to replace one of the seven members with republican legislator Richard Mendick was voted down 19-17 amid arguments that Mendick, who is a certified management accountant with more than 25 years of experience, is considerably more qualified than the member he would have replaced.

“Cash flow is such a challenge that we could run out of money to pay our bills,” Breslin continued, citing accelerated receipt of revenues, delayed payments and the tax amnesty program implemented last fall as the only reasons that this has not yet occurred. He said that his office was in the process of reviewing the capital plan, and that “at a minimum we will delay some projects and are seriously considering canceling projects as well.” He stressed that the 2011 budget would be even more difficult, and estimated that next year’s budget gap will be as much as $35 million, which “would represent a 50-percent real property tax increase.”

“I am gravely concerned about increasing expenditures and exacerbating our situation even further,” Breslin said to the leglislature. “We must be realistic about the county’s dire financial position and develop a sustainable budget. We must be diligent about how we spend each and every dollar. You and I will need to make decisions about what we spend today and what to cut in the 2011 budget. That means hard choices about the definition of essential services and changes in the way services are delivered.”

It wasn’t all doom and gloom. Breslin also discussed some of the successes that the county has had during the last year, including nearly $1 million in housing improvements, and the creation of jobs through the Empire Zone Program, loan programs and new businesses. He pointed to the county’s coordinated response to the H1N1 pandemic as proof of what can be accomplished when departments work together—10,000 people were vaccinated at 60 public clinics as a result of the efforts of the Health Department, Public Works, General Services, Informational Services and the Times Union Center. “During these dire fiscal times, we must look outside organizational boundaries. We must find opportunities to partner with other local governments in the region and continue our efforts to have our county departments work more collaboratively.”

To that end, the county will be working with the sheriff’s office to consolidate the region’s 911 call centers (currently there are 10) to operate “more efficiently and less expensively.” Albany County will also be working closely with Schenectady County to “create more liveable communities, particularly for the aging and disabled,” and already has received support from 20 local communities and funding from the state to develop a solid-waste-management authority for the Capital Region.

“Working together, we can increase recycling, reduce waste, improve efficiency and save money,” said Breslin before announcing plans to start work on a waste heat recovery project that he says will reduce energy use by 30 percent, save $15 million over the next 20 years and reduce greenhouse emissions by more than 1,400 tons a year. Ninety percent of the cost of this project is covered by stimulus funds and other grants.

“The challenges ahead of us are daunting,” Breslin concluded. “Unemployment remains high and businesses are struggling to survive. The $35 million gap we face in 2011 will force us to make real cuts in the budget. One-shot fixes and short-term changes won’t get us through this storm. We need long-term sustainable solutions. We must have the courage to make the difficult decisions that will protect county property taxpayers while maintaining the critical and essential services for those most in need.”

Whether the legislature took his warnings to heart was unclear. During the meeting that followed, they went ahead with an agreement to hire HF John Group, LLC to provide financial advice regarding the possibility of building a new county nursing home, even as one legislator pointed out that the Special Nursing Home Facilities Committee was created to do just that. They also voted in favor of funding for certain preventative service providers, rejecting a new process devised by the Department for Children, Youth and Families, which was intended to save the county around $1 million annually but has already cost the DCYF considerable time and money.

“It’s going to be a tough year,” admitted Dan McCoy, chairman of the Albany County Legislature, but he feels that Breslin’s address was too focused on negatives and the fiscal crisis. “It’s going to be a tough economy, but we need people spending their money. I think, as a leader, one of our jobs is to let the public know what’s going on, but you have to be a cheerleader. You have to talk about growth and jobs. We need to be cheerleaders about growth.”

—Ali Hibbs




Loose Ends

-no loose ends this week-



Send A Letter to Our Editor
Back Home
   
 
 
Copyright © 2002 Lou Communications, Inc., 419 Madison Ave., Albany, NY 12210. All rights reserved.